Update: May 23rd 2013 - 43 days left until Liberty Day
July 4th 2013
Taken from 3 Levels of Legal Crime
Uniform Commercial Code
I am posting this in the effort to convey a discovery of what I think constitutes knowledge. There is a contradiction expressible in words whereby one thing does not agree with the other thing, so both things do not belong together such as Legal combined with Crime, as in Legal Crime.
Put another way, I can say, that very bad people, by definition, are unruly, or incorrigible, or beyond help, or incapable of moral restraint, as if a human being were not one, as if a human being were no better than a Mad Dog, and as if a human being became an inhuman being, a being becoming even more destructive than a Mad Dog.
The problem with this understanding, this viewpoint of the available evidence, the problem with thinking that very bad people are in charge, and very bad people are in positions of authority, and very bad people are like Mad Dogs, and these Mad Dogs torture, and these Mad Dogs are guilty of mass murder, the problem here, is such that only one Mad Dog is only as powerful as one Mad Dog alone - without help.
Mad Dogs don't reason out ways to combine their individual powers into a powerful force that is more than one Mad Dog acting alone.
How can one Mad Dog, or how can one very bad human being, ever combine their individual power with another Mad Dog, or another very bad human being, without at least one rule agreed upon among the individual Mad Dogs that make up the organization of Mad Dogs?
Where is the rule book used by the very evil people who are evil people?
In other words, how can very evil people be nice to each other when they are very evil people?
In other words, what keeps evil person from cutting the throat of each other evil person?
Of course, to add to this effort, I can confess that I know how my viewpoint can be dismissed immediately by anyone who claims that the people who are ordering torture and ording mass murder are merely making mistakes, and therefore there is no need for this Conspiracy Theory that suggests a need for at least one rule that these evil people agree to follow.
There is no such thing as very evil people. There is no such thing as very evil people organizing into a group of very evil people. There is no such thing as very evil people organizing into a group of very evil people who then decide to take over the power of law and the power of legal money, so Joe, you are stupid, and therefore I can stop entertaining the validity of anything you say, because you, Joe, are so stupid. STFU Stupid Joe, or STFUSJ.
Setting aside that claim, because it is demonstrably false, but setting aside the demonstration of why it is false, I persist, and I move on, and my hope is to reach anyone caring to know better.
I think that the information available to help uncover at least one rule that is followed by those evil people who want to torture and mass murder, who then plot torture and mass murder, and who then torture and mass murder, can be found in many places, and here is one competitive place where vital information can be found:
I had a link bookmarked but the link I want to link now loads this:
DNS Made Easy
DNS service for this domain has expired with DNS Made Easy
I found a YouTube file of the same information here:
People (targets) facing Court (fraud) fines (robbery) in America (U.S.A. Corporation) may end up growing weaker, and weaker, and weaker, as their power (power to purchase or money) flows from them to those places where that power goes, as that power flows that way, flowing from people, as that power flows to people who operate those Courts (Legal Fictions).
Power flowing from people, through courts, to other places, such as the legal monetary accounts of "Judges" who get a piece of the action.
This Update I have to this Topic goes to anyone, but in particular this Update I have to this Topic goes to people who may be starting down the road of Liberty, and there may be confusion as to which way to go as the road forks at the point where crime is so well hidden behind law.
I don't know how much longer that YouTube video will be up.
The direct link I had to the information I found expired as I was writing this Update on this Topic.
You may find yourself being more severely targeted, and you may find yourself facing a "Judge".
What is happening when that happens to other people, and what might happen to you when that may happen to you?
Is there a remedy?
Is there a remedy for other people, and will there be a remedy for you, when other people find themselves more severely targeted, or when you find yourself more severely targeted, and other people, or you, find yourself facing a "Judge" in "Court"?
Will other people be powerless?
Will you be powerless?
Can you pay the money (power) already charged as your debt to be paid by you, charged to you, and charged by these people who are supposedly in charge of this place that is supposedly a Nation of free people?
Suppose someone cannot pay, and suppose someone is in "Court," and suppose someone in "Court" can remedy the claim of Debt being made against this person.
What is that remedy?
What is that remedy precisely?
What is that powerful remedy exactly, if there is one?
If someone else can use a remedy, can you use a remedy if needed?
When the National Debt Collectors collect that National Debt all is good?
Hurray, hurray, someone is paying that National Debt, how about the price of tea in China?
When the National Debt Collectors have trouble collecting that National Debt and they take other people to "Court" to get that National Debt from other people, all is still good?
When the National Debt Collectors have run out of other people to take to "Court" to collect that National Debt and you are next, in fact, you won't be collecting any subsidy at that point, no subsidy for you at that point, no subsidy of any kind will be left for you at that time, since there is no power left at that time to give you any more subsidy, so at that time, without that subsidy, what will you do, if you are now dependent upon subsidy?
So long as Legal Crime still pays well, and very well for the very Top of that Pyramid Scheme, all is well?
What happens when Legal Crime is less and less profitable?
What happens when the well dries up?
Who is in charge, who is the authority, once the well dries up?
I may not have managed to communicate well up to this point.
I have something to report, and the words are not making print.
Typing this out is tough, for some reason.
The concept of independence can be compared to the concept of community, and so there can be a community concept based upon independence, and there can be a community concept based upon community.
If the community concept of based upon independence, what power does one independent individual have over another independent individual?
If the answer is none, then an explanation is needed to explain the exceptions to the rule that no independent individual in a community concept based upon independence for those exceptional individuals who overpower other individuals.
A parent, for example, is an exception to the rule, as a child is dependent upon a parent even in a community concept based upon independence.
A community concept based upon dependence, on the other hand, is a community concept based upon dependence, so there are again, please think along with me here, to exceptions to that rule.
All, in a community concept based upon dependence, are dependent, except for the obvious exceptions.
Can you see the failure in thinking in terms of community concepts that are not independent?
Each individual person is a power of thought, an independent power of will, and so there is no such thing as a community mind, or community concept, other than a collection of independent powers of will who either agree to be a community or do not, each individual in turn, agreeing, or not agreeing, in time and place. I can agree today, and disagree tomorrow, and so can anyone else, at will.
So who has power over who?
Who has power over who, when, and where?
How can 1 person, ever, have power over more than one person at a time?
Where is any record of any agreement between any two people where two, or more, people agree to act as prescribed by the agreement?
How about this angle: I spent some time speaking with someone on this subject and the example of the Court Case where Survivors of the Waco Torture and Mass Murder by Legal Criminals were Convicted by a "Judge" of failing to be tortured to death as ordered, so they were then sent to a Warehouse to spend the rest of their lives, and that was the punishment ordered by the "Judge" who punished those survivors for failing to burn to death after being tortured for months.
So, that was my example of how a "Judge" can still do very evil things, and do so completely out in the open, and no one challenges the authority of a very evil person doing very evil things while they are employing their lawful power, and their lawful authority, in this Country.
So, if a torturing, mass murdering, evil, as evil as evil can get person, tortures, and mass murders babies, toddlers, pregnant mothers, children, teenagers, all in one place, a Church, in Texas, and then the survivors who fail to die as ordered are then put in prison for that crime of failing to die as ordered, all out in the open, all televised on National Television, all for anyone who cares to see, for those who care to see, if that can happen, then who claims any authority at all, other than absolute power to do as you please, because you can, without any accountability whatsoever?
Who claims to be an authority at all?
Someone stopping me for failing to stop at a stop sign claims authority over me?
Someone claiming that I owe 53,272 Federal Reserve Notes to the National Debt, because I happen to be a person is someone claiming authority over me?
I don't have that many Federal Reserve Notes, so what is bound to happen when someone arrives at the door to collect those Federal Reserve Notes?
Under what supposed authority do those people who order those collections claim they have said authority?
Are you not the least bit curious?