View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Mon Dec 10th, 2018 04:02 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley


Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6398
Boyd White,

That is news but not in principle, merely news in detail. How many various deceptions constitute the simple principle of deception?

If someone plans to deceive an innocent victim, so as to injure them, then in principle that is wrong because the same criminal would certainly expend effort to avoid the same fate; injury by deception. No normal, productive, independent, viable, individual seeks out victimization.

A flavor of crime is fraud. If this crime of fraud is an insignificant injury, involving only a single victim and a single criminal, then the event of the crime can be considered civil, a civil matter, a need for the criminal and the victim to solve their conflict on their own, and they can access affordable conflict resolution, known as a civil suit, or also known as arbitration. The remedy can be agreed upon by both victim and criminal, restoring the injured and the guilty to peaceful co-existence - freedom - in liberty. A government of, for, and by the people themselves, even if arbitration is a so-called public service provided by competitors seeking to supply that market demand.

What you are speaking about are crimes of the highest level of immorality - evil - and the common English word for the type of organized crime you speak about is treason. Treason is said to be a capital crime.

"...they try to trick you..."

Where did those who you speak about get their false authority to act in the manner you describe?

"A distinction has been made between a federal and national government. We ought not to determine that there is this distinction for if we do, it is questionable not only whether this convention can propose an government totally different or whether Congress itself would have a right to pass such a resolution as that before the house."

Previous to that Con-Job confessed above the Federation worked as a free market of government services, whatever people wanted people paid for, and people - not the government - commanded the power to hold criminals to account for crimes perpetrated by guilty criminals upon innocent victims.

The Conviction Factory by Roger Roots
Page 40
Private Prosecutors
"For decades before and after the Revolution, the adjudication of criminals in America was governed primarily by the rule of private prosecution: (1) victims of serious crimes approached a community grand jury, (2) the grand jury investigated the matter and issued an indictment only if it concluded that a crime should be charged, and (3) the victim himself or his representative (generally an attorney but sometimes a state attorney general) prosecuted the defendant before a petit jury of twelve men. Criminal actions were only a step away from civil actions - the only material difference being that criminal claims ostensibly involved an interest of the public at large as well as the victim. Private prosecutors acted under authority of the people and in the name of the state - but for their own vindication. The very term "prosecutor" meant criminal plaintiff and implied a private person. A government prosecutor was referred to as an attorney general and was a rare phenomenon in criminal cases at the time of the nation's {notice the affect of misrepresenting here, as there were 13 nations that were founded, not one: nation supplants federation, or profitable monopoly supplants voluntary association for mutual defense} founding. When a private individual prosecuted an action in the name of the state, the attorney general was required to allow the prosecutor to use his name - even if the attorney general himself did not approve of the action.
Private prosecution meant that criminal cases were for the most part limited by the need of crime victims for vindication. Crime victims held the keys to a potential defendant's fate and often negotiated the settlement of criminal cases. After a case was initiated in the name of the people, however, private prosecutors were prohibited from withdrawing the action pursuant to private agreement with the defendant. {plea-bargaining is voluntary when no other people are threatened by the offender, but involuntary when the potential for injury yet to be done by the offender is bought off by a private person, which then allows the offender to run amok in the playground} Court intervention was occasionally required to compel injured crime victims to appear against offenders in court and "not to make bargains to allow [defendants] to escape conviction, if the injury."

I think that the class dictatorship that you report is a number of individuals who are bound into a class because those people share a common bond: they are evil. Those people have been afforded the opportunity to use a false government power to consume innocent people. If that is not evil than what is evil?

If there is no evil, then no one is guilty of anything, and there are no innocent victims.

If people can figure out a way to deter thoughts of evil, such as this thing called the common law, then crime pays less, and especially crime under the color of law pays less, which is akin to closing an open door where the price of admission is evil intent. Why not close that door?

What is offered in this account of when things turned evil in America is the process by which that evil door is slammed shut and locked.

What is accounted for, accurately, is that door to evil being opened wide. What happened was a willful effort perpetrated by a class of people, call them aristocrats or bourgeois, if you like, while I will call them psychopaths, sociopaths, and an army of sycophants. This class, this army, these criminals infiltrated government and turned a working voluntary association for mutual defense into organized crime under the color of law.

How many ways can a deception be crafted?

People believe the lies being told, but every effort to explain the opposite, the true, the real law is met with what exactly?

People believe that the government after 1789 was worthy of credit, authority, power, despite the fact that the crimes known as African slavery, which was outlawed previously, was subsidized after 1789. People still wave the flag, salute the flag, and take oaths of allegiance to that pile of smelly lies, and the smell is burning flesh.

"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

The flag in question is a copy of the Slave Traders Corporate Flag. After 1789 the republics were no longer republics, and the Nation-State Corporation that was created was not a federation, and it was not a republic. If it was a federation then it would be divisible: a voluntary association means that the volunteers can un-volunteer after their tour of duty is up.

From top to bottom America was a voluntary association for mutual defense when the British began their war of aggression for profit, the British intended - with malice aforethought - to subjugate Americans, to make Americans pay for their own slavery. In 1789 the same subsidized slavery was put in place of the voluntary association for mutual defense.

How can that not be easy to see? Why would that be news?